In the last couple of weeks, the Jewish community has debated the merit or mistake of bringing streamer Clavicular (a known abuser of women and alleged rapist) on a public trip to Israel. Sadly, he is not the first person to get a platform in our community, despite his abuse being known (by at least some). Today, on the eve of Tisha B’av, I’m considering the loss of the Beis Hamikdash (Holy Temple) that was burned to the ground 2,000 years ago, catapulting the Jewish people into a painful exile, where we’ve been murdered, expelled, and tortured in almost every land we’ve ever lived in since then. I am thinking how the protection of abusive people is related to why we remain in exile. But I may have found an insight into how we can end this nightmare based on a new translation of a familiar Tisha b’Av term.
We are told that the Temple was destroyed due to sinas chinam – which is usually translated as “baseless hatred,” (and literally means “free hatred”) but to be honest, I’ve never understood how that term relates to the famous story of Kamsa and Bar Kamsa, which the Talmud says was the beginning of our exile.
There was a wealthy man who lived in the 1st century C.E. For an upcoming party he sent his servant to deliver an invitation to his friend Kamsa. However, the servant accidentally delivered the invitation to Bar Kamsa, an enemy of the wealthy man. Upon seeing his enemy at his party, the host ordered Bar Kamsa to leave. Bar Kamsa, attempting to save face, tried to bargain and beg and find a way not to be thrown out. First he offered to pay for the food he ate, then for half of the expenses of the party, and then for the entire party. Each request was rebuffed by the angry host. Finally, the host forcibly removed Bar Kamsa, in the presence of the communal leaders who didn’t have the courage to protest the shameful actions of a wealthy and powerful member of their community.
Bar Kamsa vowed revenge against the rabbis who sat idly by as he was publicly humiliated. He visited the Roman Caesar who controlled the region and told him the Jews were inciting to revolt against the Roman Empire. Caesar, unsure of whether to believe Bar Kamsa, sent an animal to be sacrificed as a peace offering in the Temple in Jerusalem along with Bar Kamsa. On the way, Bar Kamsa made a small incision in the animal’s lip which disqualified it for a Jewish sacrifice. The rabbis refused the offering which incensed Caesar and led him to believe that the Jews were planning to revolt. He then sent an army to lay siege to Jerusalem, eventually leading to its downfall in the year 70 C.E.
So how does the story of Kamsa and bar Kamsa connect to a new translation of sinas chinam? The abuse that Bar Kamsa experienced wasn’t only from the host. It was painfully compounded by the bystanders who saw what was happening, but didn’t have the courage to stop it.
There is a cost of speaking up, which is why human nature leads many people to remain passive. At JITC, we see this every day. There is a cost of speaking up to the studios to fight antisemitism (which we do in our Hollywood Bureau). There is a cost of standing up to problems in the Orthodox community, which we do in our Tikun branch. We are solving problems that most people would never tackle because they are too afraid of confrontation. Instead, they settle for the “freeness” – the chinam – of letting hate and evil prevail. The sinas chinam that destroyed our Temple perhaps was due to the many people who didn’t want to pay the price of stopping abuse and injustice around them. But the Talmud teaches, “To be silent is to be complicit.”
Every single one of us has the power to prevent another chorban (destruction) of another person’s life. Any one of us who knows of a dangerous person out there, going unchecked, has a Torah commandment to not stand idly by our neighbor’s blood.
After 2,000 years of torture, we still haven’t gotten this right. We won’t be returned to our homeland, the wholeness of our nation restored, unless we are courageous enough to protect the innocent against those who do them harm. We can stop the charismatic leaders by publicizing their behavior, we can refuse to never associate with known abusers. Kamsa and Bar Kamsa is not a story about the past.
Speak up in the face of injustice and abuse. Silence may seem like the easier road to take, but it’s not actually free. We’ve been paying its price for 2000 years.
If you found this content meaningful and want to help further our mission through our Keter, Makom, and Tikun branches, please consider becoming a Change Maker today.
6 comments
Sort by
I think your article is very superficial. Speaking up is a brave thing to do but to say in such a sweeping manner that the price is always worth it is a very shallow thing to say.
The story of Bar Kamza should be analyzed in a more in-depth way.
As a parable of human nature, the Bar Kamza story is very accurate.
But as a morality tale, there are many problems with it.
The wealthy man who unnecessarily humiliated Bar Kamza was 100% wrong. But Bar Kamza was even more wrong for bearing false witness & taking revenge on everyone.
Should the “bystanders” have spoken up?
The truth is that the story doesn’t give enough information to answer this question.
Thanks for your comment. But I don’t think this is a superficial reading at all. We have many sources which tell us that we cannot stand idly by our neighbors blood and that silence is complicity.
The gemara writes (Gittin 57a),’Rebbe Elazar says, ‘Come and see how great the power of embarrassment is. Behold, Hashem assisted Bar Kamsa, destroyed His house and burned His sanctuary.'” On that Gemara, Ohr Somayach writes the following https://ohr.edu/yhiy/article.php/3990?showobject=1 “Bar Kamsa was humiliated in public when he was thrown out of a large festive meal. The great Rabbis of the time were in attendance and they did not protest his disgrace. Bar Kamsa took revenge (and we see that Hashem helped him) by nforming to the Romans and thereby causing the destruction of Jerusalem.”
It seems to be quite clear that failure to stop someone from getting hurt, while you’re watching the hurt happen, is the cause of the destruction of the Temple.
As I said in my earlier post, as a parable of human nature this story is very accurate.
But what is superficial is to see it as solely that Bar Kamza was wronged. His reaction was even more wrong because his actions punished everyone there AND everyone who was not there. He was humiliated & yes, humiliation can be LIKE shedding blood but it is NOT ACTUALLY shedding blood. Bar Kamza’s behavior was selfish & narcissistic. His extreme reaction to his humiliation resulted in actual blood being shed & the blood of hundreds of thousands of innocent people.
The communal leaders/rabbis did not intervene –
Does the story itself (not the later commentaries) say they knew all the facts? Does the story say they heard everything that was going on? Does the story say that they were acquainted with the two men & knew the background of the conflict, i.e. why they were enemies? Does the story say why Bar Kamza even wanted to attend a party at the home of someone who considered him an enemy? Shouldn’t Bar Kamza have simply left when he was asked to instead of begging to stay – didn’t he add to his own humiliation instead of mitigating it? Does the story say that this was a unique or common occurrence of that time?
There are so many details that aren’t provided in this story. And, in my very humble opinion, this is because it is a parable not a history.
We SHOULD speak up when the situation demands it. BUT it takes a great deal of courage & we must also acknowledge the reality that those who do speak up often pay a very heavy price for it. It’s not as cut & dried an issue as the article makes it out to be.
Thanks for your comment. I agree that there is a cost to speaking up – which is why most people stay silent. As I quoted from the Gemara – God Himself was so horrified by the humiliation and the lack of intervention by the rabbis of the time that He helped burn His house down. So yes, there is a cost of speaking up but I believe this story is telling us that the cost of staying silent in the face of hatred is actually a greater price to pay.
Perhaps someone might consider re-studying Chofetz Chaim? From baseless hatred to baseless love.
Thanks for your comment. Are you suggesting that we shouldn’t always speak up to stop someone harming someone else because of lashon Harah? Al samod al dam reyecha is specifically cited after the prohibition of gossiping so that we understand that while we may not gossip, when it comes to preventing someone from being harmed, we must step up.