fbpx
keter

Superheroes Have Disabilities, Why Do Kohanim Have To Be Physically Perfect?

Dear Jew in the City-

I have a question that’s half Jewish and half superhero. There’s this newish trend to make superheroes not physically perfect. It maybe started with Daredevil and The Eternals specifically included disabled superheroes. This got me thinking about how kohanim can’t have a mum (defect). It seems to me that if a superhero was crafted from scratch, we’d want them to be physically perfect like a kohen has to be. I’m not sure if you have any thoughts on this matter. Isn’t physical perfection sometimes required? Can we make room for that without assuming that it means we don’t value people with disabilities?

Thanks,

C.D.

Dear C.D.-

Thanks for your question. I’m sure readers are breathing a sigh of relief saying, “Comic books – finally a topic he knows about!” 

Before we get to kohanim, let me disabuse you of one misconception – superheroes with disabilities are far from a “newish trend.” In fact, they go all the way back to the Golden Age of comics:

  • Doctor Mid-Nite, a member of DC’s Justice Society created in 1941, was blind;
  • Before Marvel had a character with disabilities called Daredevil, Lev Gleason Publications had one. In his original 1940 appearance, the character was mute;
  • Freddy Freeman, alter ego of Fawcett’s (later DC’s) Captain Marvel Jr. has been using a crutch since his first appearance in 1941;
  • Dr. Don Blake, originally the alter ego of Marvel’s Thor, walked with a cane since his first appearance in 1962;
  • The Chief of DC’s Doom Patrol and Professor X of Marvel’s X-Men – each of whom first appeared in 1963 – are both in wheelchairs;
  • DC’s Batgirl Barbara Gordon was shot by the Joker in 1988’s Batman: The Killing Joke. Requiring a wheelchair, she reinvented herself in 1989 as Oracle. (After decades as Oracle, Barbara is again Batgirl thanks to DC’s numerous reboots, but it’s worth noting that it was as Oracle that she became a member of the Justice League.)

There are other cases I could name but I think you get the point.

So yes, while most superheroes are paragons of physical perfection – tall, conventionally attractive, rippling with muscles (and, in the case of women, ridiculously over-endowed) – there has always been a degree of representation. If anything, superheroes represented people with disabilities far sooner and with greater regularity than they did people of color.

Now, as luck would have it, I also happen to know something about disabilities in Judaism, having written on this topic a number of times for my “day job.” I think it’s worth pointing out that a number of Biblical personages also had disabilities:

  • The patriarch Yitzchak was blind, as seen in Genesis chapter 27;
  • After his confrontation with the angel in Genesis chapter 32, Yaakov walked with a limp;
  • According to our tradition, Chushim son of Dan was deaf. It was he who smote Eisav for impeding Yaakov’s funeral (Talmud Sotah 13a);
  • Moshe, the greatest of all prophets, stuttered (Shemos Rabbah on Exodus 4:10); 
  • King Yeravam tried to trick the prophet Achiya Hashiloni, who was blind, but his prophecy more than compensated for his disability (I Kings 14);
  • Mefiboshes, the son of King Saul’s son Yonasan, was unable to walk (II Samuel 4). He was a beloved of King David and, according to the Talmud, a great Torah scholar and David’s rebbe (Brachos 4a);
  • Not all of the people with disabilities were on our side. According to the Midrash, Pharoah Necho, who reigned in the time of King Yoshiyahu, was unable to walk due to an injury. His disability didn’t stop him from conquering the kingdom of Judah and making it a vassal state in II Kings 23.

Again, there are more examples we could give.

Now let’s discuss the obligation for kohanim – Jewish “priests,” who performed the service in the Temple – to be “without blemish.” Leviticus 21:16-21 tells us:

Hashem said to Moshe, “Say to Aharon: ‘For the generations to come none of your descendants who has a defect may come near to offer the food of his God. No man who has any defect may come near: no man who is blind or lame, disfigured or deformed; no man with a crippled foot or hand, or who is hunchbacked or dwarfed, or who has any eye defect, or who has festering or running sores or damaged testicles. No descendant of Aharon the kohein who has any defect is to come near to present the offerings made to Hashem by fire. He has a defect; he must not come near to offer the food of his God.

So are we kidding ourselves when we say that the Torah values all people equally?

Generally speaking, disabilities are a non-issue. Yitzchak and Yaakov continued to be patriarchs despite their disabilities. In a dispute that was evaluated by King David in II Samuel 19, Mefiboshes’ disability wasn’t taken into account, neither to his advantage nor to his disadvantage. Of all the things for which Moshe is criticized – his marriage, the lack of meat, his appointment of leaders, etc. – his leadership is never questioned based on his speech impediment.

If disabilities are generally a non-issue, why should they disqualify a kohein from performing the Temple service?

The answer can be found in the Rambam’s explanation for this mitzvah in Moreh Nevuchim 3:45:

In order to raise the estimation of the Temple, those who ministered therein received great honor: the priests and Levites were therefore distinguished from the rest. It was commanded that the priests should be clothed properly with beautiful and good garments, “holy garments for glory and for beauty” (Exodus 28: 2). A priest who had a blemish was not allowed to officiate. Not only those who had a blemish were excluded from the service, but also – according to the Talmudic interpretation of this mitzvah – those who had an abnormal appearance. This is because the masses do not judge a person by his true form but by the perfection of his bodily limbs and the beauty of his garments, and the Temple needed to be held in great reverence by all. 

The operative phrase is, “the masses do not judge a person by his true form but by the perfection of his bodily limbs and the beauty of his garments.” The true flaw, we see, lies not in the kohein with visual impairment, the kohein with hearing loss or the kohein who can’t walk. Rather, the flaw lies in the masses, who are unable to judge the true value of a person, substance rather than surface. Moshe had a valid concern when he said the people wouldn’t listen to him because of his speech impediment (Exodus 4:10); there are people who won’t pay attention to anyone but an eloquent speaker. God responded by appointing Aharon to act as Moshe’s spokesman. Similarly, there are those who wouldn’t give the Temple the proper awe if those officiating didn’t meet their idea of perfection. These people may be wrong, but their opinion – however misguided – was widespread enough that it needed to be accommodated in order for the Temple to be held in proper esteem.

The exclusion of “imperfect” kohanim – a concession to a flaw of the masses – is anomalous. Generally speaking, the Torah demonstrates a rich history of inclusion. Throughout Tanach, a person’s disabilities are almost always incidental. They rarely impede one’s ability to participate in the fullness of community, up to and including leadership.

So if you can shoot fire from your fingertips and you also have scoliosis, go ahead and be a superhero who wears a back brace. Nothing in the Torah suggests you can’t.

Sincerely,

Rabbi Jack Abramowitz
Educational Correspondent
Follow Ask Rabbi Jack on YouTube

If you found this content meaningful and want to help further our mission through our Keter, Makom, and Tikun branches, please consider becoming a Change Maker today.

397613

3 comments

Sort by

  • Sb says on November 23, 2021

    It’s worth noting that kohanim with a mum could still do some tasks such as checking wood

    Reply
  • Shayndi says on November 25, 2021

    This issue has always bothered me a lot.

    If your explanation holds true, then wouldn’t it follow that in ancient times, when everything was more primitive, this would have been so, but nowadays, with social advances and the way people with disabilities are shown respect (and demand it etc), wouldn’t it follow that this should be changed?

    The Rambam also writes that women can’t understand deep concepts,and therefore should not be taught Torah. I was taught that this is due to the lack of female education in his day, and therefore does not apply today.

    Could this be the same?

    Thanks.

    PS. Your comic knowledge is exceedingly impressive even for someone who has never been a fan 😉

    Reply
    • Rabbi Jack Abramowitz says on November 25, 2021

      There’s a reason the Torah doesn’t give reasons for the mitzvos, and there’s a difference of opinion in the Talmud as to whether one may do so. That’s because some people, if they know the reason for a mitzvah, will then decide that the mitzvah no longer applies, or doesn’t apply to them. The classic example of this is people who say that kosher food was commanded for health reasons so, since we’ve conquered trichinosis, we should be able to eat pork. (Or walking is more effort, so we should drive on Shabbos.) It doesn’t work that way. We do the mitzvos because God said so; “reasons” that we give are lessons for us, not reasons to opt in or out of a mitzvah.

      Women’s education is a different matter; that’s not a question of a Torah commandment.

      Reply

Contact formLeave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Are Chanukah and Purim the Only Holidays We’ll Still Celebrate When Moshiach Comes?

Our Place Provides A Safe Space For Orthodox Jewish Teens On The Street

Previous post

The Orthodox Jewish Illustrator Whose Clients Include Red Bull, Comedy Central & Bud Light

Next post

Orthodox Jewish Teen Subjected to Viral Antisemitic Attack on TikTok

IT'S FINE
We’ll Schlep To You

Get JITC
In Your
Inbox Weekly

Copy link
Powered by Social Snap