Editor’s Note: Last week at my daughter’s school, I saw a wonderful quote by Abraham Lincoln. One of his general’s said, “We should pray that God is on our side. Lincoln responded, “Sir, my concern is not whether God is on our side; my greatest concern is to be on God’s side, for God is always right.”
With the midterm elections only hours away and a country more divided than ever, we are attempting to find some common ground. Perhaps, what upsets me the most about the current political climate is the lack of self-doubt. We are sure that OUR side is the side of truth and that the other side is manipulative and power-hungry and will do anything to that end. We recently polled 400 of our readers and 15% told us they believe their political opponent is not just wrong, but actually evil.
But when both halves the country thinks that about the other half, what are we left with? Today, we are publishing an article co-written by an Orthodox Jewish Liberal and an Orthodox Jewish Conservative, about how they see Torah values in their political persuasion. Yes, there are power-hungry extremists on both sides, but I firmly believe that most people try to do good in this world. We don’t know if God is on our side, but we should pray that we are on His. (Please note, we are publishing the Liberal perspective first as it is more unusual in the Orthodox Jewish community and fits our tagline of “Orthodox. Unexpected.”)
Why I’m An Orthodox Jewish Liberal
By Rachel Wasserman
In my Atlanta community, I am an anomaly. I belong to the more “right-wing” Orthodox synagogue, and yet I proudly vote blue down the line and speak freely about my liberal political views. To me, the two are not incompatible, and yet people often react with surprise when they hear this is the case. There is an assumption that Orthodox Jews are all politically conservative. According to a survey by the American Jewish Committee, in the 2016 presidential election, 54% of Orthodox Jews voted for Trump, while only 13% voted for Clinton. While these may be the statistics nationally, in my Orthodox neighborhood, it seems even more imbalanced. In general, I try to avoid political discussions with members of my Orthodox community. I do not enjoy debating politics, so I find it easier to leave the subject alone and focus more on what unites us than what divides us. At the same time, I am unapologetic about my politics, which can sometimes lead to teasing from fellow congregants. While my outward reaction tends to be smiling and quickly changing the subject, these incidents always remind me about my outsider status.
I did not become Orthodox until my early 20s, at which point my political views were firmly set. By that time, I had graduated from a notoriously liberal university and was pursuing a career in social work, a field largely occupied by progressive women. I was a feminist, a humanitarian, a social activist, and now an Orthodox Jew. To me, these were all in perfect alignment. Living a life dictated by Torah commandments did not take away from any of my liberal views. If anything, being Orthodox added to my sense that making the world a better place is a duty that falls on all of our shoulders. My favorite lesson from all of Talmud is Pirchei Avot 2:21, which teaches, “you are not obligated to complete the work, but neither are you free to desist from it.” To me, this is Hashem telling us that we should work every day to make the world a better place for everyone in it, which is the same underlying belief that dictates my liberal politics.
I am hard-wired to be progressive. To me, it was never a choice. Liberal political values feel natural to me. I believe that it is society’s responsibility to care for the disadvantaged, and that the government must ensure basic human needs are met and that people live with dignity and equality. I think our government is uniquely positioned to care for its citizens and that human rights and civil liberties must take priority over individual rights. We see these lessons repeatedly in the Torah as well. The Book of Exodus provides guidelines for taking care of orphans, widows, and strangers. In Leviticus, we learn about leaving the corners of our fields for the poor.
I have always valued having a diverse group of friends, and as a child my closest companions were racially, ethnically, and religiously different from myself. However, it wasn’t until I was in my 30s and moved to Atlanta that I formed close friendships with people who have different political views than my own. While my Orthodox friends and I do not regularly discuss politics with each other, we have been able to gain respect for each other’s opinions and put a face to the “other.” In the tense political climate that has enveloped us for the past few years, I find extreme value in this.
There is no one mold when it comes to Orthodox Jews. We dress differently, we talk differently, and we vote differently. What unites us all is our belief that the Torah is the word of Hashem, and that we are duty-bound to accept its commandments. Outside of that, we have the freedom to express our individuality. For me, my politics and my religion are seamlessly married, and while I do sometimes feel like a minority within a minority, I wouldn’t change any of it for the world.
Why I’m an Orthodox Jewish Conservative
by Yali Elkin
Conservatism – as it was once taught – is a philosophy that protects the individual from tyranny of the majority. It is based on the idea that citizens are independent enough to make their own life choices and live with the consequences.
This resonates profoundly with many Torah Jews. Such a society requires a high moral minimum, as the United States’ founders acknowledged. For this grand experiment in self-governance to succeed, they noted that the people must be virtuous and educated. Conservatism opposes an encroaching state, and protects our right to worship, study and live as Jews while enjoying the full rights of citizenship.
Conservatism is rooted in an intellectual humility about the limits of the government, a case underscored by the repeated, embarrassing failures of overly-ambitious government undertakings (such as certain anti-poverty measures or educational policies that have done nothing to improve their targets). This colors my approach to emotionally-fraught issues like the environment, abortion, and gun rights, but it also informs my views on the very role of government to begin with.
The Environment
The Torah teaches that we were given dominion over the balance of creation and told to be fruitful and multiply, filling the earth and subduing it (Genesis 1:28). This is at odds with the liberal fears of population crisis. Similarly, the apocalyptic predictions of environmental disaster seem somewhat alarmist when I read “the world stands firm, it cannot be shaken” (Psalms 93:1). The same goes for rising ocean levels when we read Borchi Nafshi (Psalm 104) every Rosh Chodesh.
Of course, this is not to say that we should be wasteful or wantonly destructive. We are explicitly commanded to be faithful stewards of the earth. We cannot destroy trees for no reason, and even in a siege, fruit-bearing ones are protected. But neither our precious children’s nor our use of resources threatens G-d’s handiwork in creating the world.
Abortion
While abortion-as-contraception is halakhically forbidden, there are Torah thresholds of life, viability and maternal health that differ from legal definitions. Abortion-on-demand has become more common, as the number performed in the US each year is daunting. One can sympathize with the minority of mothers who need one for exigent medical circumstances while weeping for those that seek them for convenience. The Torah perspective on this aligns much more with conservative values than with liberal ones.
Guns
Prominently featured in America’s DNA is the individual’s right to keep and bear arms. America won independence through armed farmers defending their homes against the most intimidating army in the world. The instruments of their victory were enshrined in the Second Amendment and it is something unique to anyone familiar with Jewish history. Since the destruction of the Temple, Jews have been subjects, not citizens. But since 1789, we have always been full citizens of this great country, trusted to keep and bear arms like everyone else. An armed society is a polite one and a polite society respects individual rights. Owning guns is both in total harmony with halakha and, quite possibly, a good idea to anyone familiar with Jewish history. Yes, they are weapons created to kill, but what matters – like with cars, knives or other inanimate objects used in crimes – is the intent and capacity of the user. They are, in fact, used more to prevent crimes than commit them.
Conservative policies empower people and protect our freedoms and liberties. But for such a social vision to flourish, it requires citizens to be charitable, educated and engaged. Handing off these responsibilities to the government is to court disaster (and does not satisfy our obligations to give tzedakah or to educate our children). This is something that many committed, educated and observant Jews like me celebrate and embrace. The power of the state has undermined and threatened Jewish rights for centuries. It is something we should seek to minimize.
Lastly, conservatives still subscribe to moral absolutes. To be conservative is to have the confidence to make value judgments about culture and to celebrate – and build on – what’s best about ours. It takes a modicum of such moral clarity, for example, to identify Israel as wholly deserving of America’s support and friendship on the one hand, and the nihilistic Arab terrorists who want nothing more than Israel’s destruction on the other. This used to be a simple and undeniable bipartisan reality. Unfortunately, it has become a wedge issue, with the average conservative politician today being a more ardent supporter of the US-Israel alliance and friendship than the most pro-Israel liberal. On this point alone, I believe, the sides could not be more clearly defined.
As Margaret Thatcher famously noted, “the facts of life are conservative.” This is why I vote the way I do.
About the Authors:
Rachel Wasserman is a social activist, working mom, feminist, and writer and speaker about women’s leadership and philanthropy. Rachel received her bachelor’s from Brown University in Psychology and Judaic Studies, her master’s in Social Work from Columbia University, and her master’s in Jewish Studies from The Jewish Theological Seminary of America. She is a Jewish communal professional who grew up on a farm in Lexington, Kentucky and now lives in Atlanta, Georgia. These views are her own and do not reflect the beliefs of her employer.
Yali Elkin is a CFO and avid reader who lives in Teaneck, New Jersey with his wife and children.
If you found this content meaningful and want to help further our mission through our Keter, Makom, and Tikun branches, please consider becoming a Change Maker today.
6 comments
Sort by
Please do not compare cars to guns in the context of inanimate objects used in crimes. While cars may be used to harm they are not produced for this reason. Guns have one purpose if used as intended and that is to kill.
Guns are obviously created with one purpose in mind, namely to inflict lethal damage on a target. I don’t think anyone disputes this. But guns also helped midwife every American and Israeli military victory. What matters is the user and the target. As Tolkien wrote, “I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.”
That is how I view guns. Bad people will always have them. The only choice you or I get to make is whether to be the next potential victim or the last.
Thank you for reading and sharing your thoughts!
-Yali
Maybe because I’m a “moderate”, I always think it’s strange that “conservatives” often site the right to own guns as a major issue. I think these days, most liberals are not trying to TAKE AWAY all the guns. They want sensible gun laws, background checks, etc. which seems like a good thing, no? Also, regarding Israel I often wonder why a lot of religious Jews vote for candidates who seem “pro-Israel” even if their midot are horrible or they have alliances with anti-semites. I believe that Hashem will take care of Israel whether or not the leaders in the US want to give less aid to Israel, or whether they want to support Israel at all costs (even if sometimes politically Israel makes unwise choices, they won’t critique or cut aid…) But as long as our leaders are not saying Israel shouldn’t EXIST, then I don’t get why we can’t be okay with having emuna that Hashem will give israel what israel needs to survive and thrive, no matter who holds political positions in America.
Firstly, many liberals are explicitly (and occasionally not so explicitly) trying to confiscate legal guns. The language they use in both campaigns and legislation is often inflammatory (“the NRA has blood on its hands!”) and ignorant (when it comes to types of guns, accessories and ammunition varieties). There is no good faith left anymore to be presumed by gun owners and so both sides hunker down and wait for the Supreme Court to render another Solomonic decision, continuing its apotheosis into the most powerful 9-man Parliament in the world. None of this is good.
Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, gun rights are a good litmus test for your views on human nature, government and its proper limits in the daily lives of the people. I still believe in the fundamental moral agency and, thus, responsibilityn of every person. If ordinary people can’t be trusted with guns, history shows it seldom stops there. Trying buying a chef’s knife in the UK now. And while you’re at it, try making a dumb joke on Twitter or Facebook there. Actually, don’t: you could end up in jail.
Third, many “common sense” reforms are just confiscation via bureaucracy. Try applying for a gun license in New York or New Jersey. Then tell me that the process needs to be harder.
Lastly, yes, we should ALWAYS have emunah! But when G-d presents us with His agents in the form of candidates for elected office, I believe we should examine the choices carefully before voting. I strive to have complete faith and trust in Him, but I hardly think it fair to ask Him to do all the work down here by Himself.
Thanks for reading and sharing your input!
-Yali
I would say that Yali has imported Christian/conservative values into his perception of Judaism. For example, Jewish law can be far more flexible on the issue of abortion than the religiously inspired pro-life position. In fact, in order to protect our religious freedom to perform abortions in accordance with our religion one needs to err on the pro-choice side. That protection is far more in line with classic conservative values.
Not sure how you got there since I specifically noted that, but I’d encourage you to read up a bit more. By some estimates, a majority of a abortions done each year are essentially as contraception and not, for example, to save the life of the mother (I would invite you to read Rav Soloveitchik and Rav Moshe Feinstein on the question). Yes, the halakhic definitions of fetal viability and standards for protecting a mother can diverge from some of those used by many Christian conservatives, but a majority of procedures today are problematic across most, if not all, confessional lines. Limiting those would be a great first step culturally and morally. Then we can argue over the rest.
Thank you for reading and taking the time to share your thoughts.